cop rule

saeko

Sorry but no, I do not like this rule being changed again were we can't kill someone that we see murder someone.

If your a Cop post in blue glow why you like/or dislike about this rule.

If your a Civ.(NO COP) post in red glow why you like/dislike about this rule.

KingofKFCJamal

Basically the reason why we decided against this rule once again was that people can just claim self-defense and say that you are Cop RDMing, leading to bullshit reports that we want to avoid. As I remember in the meeting, you didn't speak against this decision, so I don't know what to tell you.

myback

One explanation may not be enough so I will support here with two scenarios:

Assume Tom is a cop, Robert is a civilian defending himself, and Laura is an aggressive civilian wanting to kill.

Scenario A

Laura attacks Robert and hurts him. Robert defends himself and kills Laura. Cop Tom sees this and must follow this former rule by killing Robert. Robert dies because he had to defend himself from Laura.

Scenario B

Tom can abuse his cop and kill Robert even though Laura did not attack him. Then Tom will lie and tell everyone Robert was attacking him or Laura. The judgement sadly will be trusted to the abusing cop, Tom.

Skittle

myback wrote
Tom can abuse his cop and kill Robert even though Laura did not attack him. Then Tom will lie and tell everyone Robert was attacking him or Laura. The judgement sadly will be trusted to the abusing cop, Tom.

A way to prevent this is to raise hours needed to get cop, and not accept so many cops.

myback

Skittle wrote
myback wrote
Tom can abuse his cop and kill Robert even though Laura did not attack him. Then Tom will lie and tell everyone Robert was attacking him or Laura. The judgement sadly will be trusted to the abusing cop, Tom.

A way to prevent this is to raise hours needed to get cop, and not accept so many cops.

The rule is already outlawed, it's too late
That's only one out of the two loopholeish scenarios
That'd still happen because TJ lied to us all, he has around 1000 hours right now.
Cop is already being trashed and outlawed as it is, we really don't need to raise the requirements. It should be an easy goal.

Doge1

This rule would be honestly pretty dumb and could be abused really hard. For example, Laxative kills Anonymous and takes his drugs. Cop follows laxative to drug dealer and laxative sells drugs. Cop kills laxative and laxative gets killed and loses his money. I can already see that happening and it wouldn't be good.

saeko

King of KFC Jamal wrote
Basically the reason why we decided against this rule once again was that people can just claim self-defense and say that you are Cop RDMing, leading to bullshit reports that we want to avoid. As I remember in the meeting, you didn't speak against this decision, so I don't know what to tell you.

Wasn't there

Skittle

You don't lose money when killed by a cop Doge

Doge1

Skittle wrote
You don't lose money when killed by a cop Doge

OK FINE TINK OF IT THIS WAY
Doge is walking down the street with 50,000 grams on him Linx tries to kill him but Doge Kills Linx. Mr Copper then kills Doge and doge respawns in the middle of nowhere with all of his drugs on him RIP Doge 2K16..

myback

Did you bother to read what I said? The situations above outweigh yours. We can't keep favoring the drug dealer job for the rest of our lives.